30 Aug 2009

45% Employers use Facebook-Twitter to screen job candidates

Why Employers Disregarded Candidates After Screening Online

Job seekers are cautioned to be mindful of the information they post online and how they communicate directly with employers. Thirty-five percent of employers reported they have found content on social networking sites that caused them not to hire the candidate. The top examples cited include:

Candidate posted provocative or inappropriate photographs or information - 53 percent

Candidate posted content about them drinking or using drugs - 44 percent

Candidate bad-mouthed their previous employer, co-workers or clients - 35 percent

Candidate showed poor communication skills - 29 percent

Candidate made discriminatory comments - 26 percent

Candidate lied about qualifications - 24 percent

Candidate shared confidential information from previous employer - 20 percent

Fourteen percent of employers have disregarded a candidate because the candidate sent a message using an emoticon such as a smiley face while 16 percent dismissed a candidate for using text language such as GR8 (great) in an e-mail or job application.

This should not come as a surprise to anyone who is worth his salt at all. With the increasing popularity of Social Networking Sites (SNS), Blogging and Micro-blogging tools, and the abundance of information available on the internet, it should not come as a surprise that the online world would be a source of information that employers turn to when checking up on a prospective employee.

It is only natural that employers want to know what they are in for, when they hire a particular candidate. Instead of trying to hide yourself (a futile attempt, really), why not try to manage your online image?